Skip to main content
Home
  • Connect!
  • Donate
  • My Account
  • Join/Login
  • S
  • Connect!
  • Join/Login
  • Home
  • About
    • What is Social and Personality Psychology?
    • Leadership
      • Elections
    • Get Involved
    • Committees
    • Diversity & Inclusion Initiatives
    • Government Relations
    • Governance Documents
    • Staff
    • Jobs at SPSP
      • Benefits of Working at SPSP
      • Current Openings
  • Members
    • Membership Categories and Rates
    • Member Demographics
    • Member Directory
    • Collaboration Zone
    • APA Division 8
    • Fellows
    • Listservs and Shared Interest Groups
    • Member Deals and Discounts
  • Publications
    • Best Practices
    • Publication Policies
    • Resources
    • PSPB
      • Editorial Philosophy
      • Manuscript Preparation/Submission Guidelines
      • PSPB Online
    • PSPR
      • Editorial Philosophy
      • Manuscript Preparation
      • PSPR Online
    • SPPS
      • Manuscript Preparation
      • SPPS Online
  • Events
    • 2022 Convention
    • Future/Past Conventions
    • Summer Psychology Forum
    • Society of Southeastern Social Psychologists
    • APA Convention (Division 8)
    • Student Opportunities
      • SISPP
      • SPUR
      • EASP
      • EAPP
    • Learning Online
  • Giving
    • Ways to Give
    • Planned Giving
    • Tribute Wall
    • Annual Reports
    • ARP Awards
  • Awards/Grants
    • Annual Awards
      • Senior Career Contribution Awards
      • Mid-Career Awards
      • Early Career Awards
      • Teaching and Mentoring Awards
      • Prizes for a Single Outstanding Contribution
      • Media Awards
      • Service Awards
      • Student Awards
      • Diversity Awards
    • Student Awards
      • Heritage Dissertation Research Award
      • Outstanding Research Award
      • Graduate Student Poster Award
      • Undergraduate Student Poster Award
      • Student Publication Prize
      • Jenessa Shapiro Graduate Research Award
      • Graduate Travel/Registration Award
      • Diversity Graduate Travel/Registration Award
      • Diversity Undergraduate Registration Award
    • Diversity Awards
      • Jenessa Shapiro Award for Contributions to Diversity and Inclusion
      • Jenessa Shapiro Graduate Research Award
      • Diversity Graduate Travel/Registration Award
      • Diversity Undergraduate Registration Award
    • Heritage Wall of Fame
    • International Awards
      • International Travel/Registration Award
      • International Bridge-Building Award
    • Legacy Program
    • Travel/Registration Awards
      • Graduate Travel/Registration Award
      • Diversity Graduate Travel/Registration Award
      • Diversity Undergraduate Registration Award
      • Teacher & Scholar Travel/Registration Award
      • International Travel/Registration Award
      • International Bridge-Building Award
    • Small Research Grant Program
    • Small Conference Grant Program
    • Community Catalyst Grant Program
  • News
    • Character and Context Blog
    • Member Updates
    • Press Releases
    • Member Newsletter
    • Student Newsletter
  • Resources
    • Connect!
    • Racism, Bias & Diversity
    • Free-Form Fridays
    • Students
      • Graduate Program Directory
      • Applying to Grad School
      • Life in Graduate School
    • Early Career
    • Primarily Undergraduate Institutions
    • Multimedia
      • #SPSPchat
      • SPSP Experts
      • Out of the Lab
      • Convention Videos
    • Funding
    • International Study and Work
    • Statistics & Data Analysis
    • Teaching
      • Recommended Textbooks
      • Syllabi Examples
      • Teaching Aids
      • Video
    • Applied Psychology
  • Careers
    • Find/Post a Job
    • Graduation Outcomes
    • Career Resources
    • Academic Job Market
    • Non-Academic Job Market
    • Undergraduate Research
  • Connect!
  • Join/Login
  • Home
  • About
    • What is Social and Personality Psychology?
    • Leadership
      • Elections
    • Get Involved
    • Committees
    • Diversity & Inclusion Initiatives
    • Government Relations
    • Governance Documents
    • Staff
    • Jobs at SPSP
      • Benefits of Working at SPSP
      • Current Openings
  • Members
    • Membership Categories and Rates
    • Member Demographics
    • Member Directory
    • Collaboration Zone
    • APA Division 8
    • Fellows
    • Listservs and Shared Interest Groups
    • Member Deals and Discounts
  • Publications
    • Best Practices
    • Publication Policies
    • Resources
    • PSPB
      • Editorial Philosophy
      • Manuscript Preparation/Submission Guidelines
      • PSPB Online
    • PSPR
      • Editorial Philosophy
      • Manuscript Preparation
      • PSPR Online
    • SPPS
      • Manuscript Preparation
      • SPPS Online
  • Events
    • 2022 Convention
    • Future/Past Conventions
    • Summer Psychology Forum
    • Society of Southeastern Social Psychologists
    • APA Convention (Division 8)
    • Student Opportunities
      • SISPP
      • SPUR
      • EASP
      • EAPP
    • Learning Online
  • Giving
    • Ways to Give
    • Planned Giving
    • Tribute Wall
    • Annual Reports
    • ARP Awards
  • Awards/Grants
    • Annual Awards
      • Senior Career Contribution Awards
      • Mid-Career Awards
      • Early Career Awards
      • Teaching and Mentoring Awards
      • Prizes for a Single Outstanding Contribution
      • Media Awards
      • Service Awards
      • Student Awards
      • Diversity Awards
    • Student Awards
      • Heritage Dissertation Research Award
      • Outstanding Research Award
      • Graduate Student Poster Award
      • Undergraduate Student Poster Award
      • Student Publication Prize
      • Jenessa Shapiro Graduate Research Award
      • Graduate Travel/Registration Award
      • Diversity Graduate Travel/Registration Award
      • Diversity Undergraduate Registration Award
    • Diversity Awards
      • Jenessa Shapiro Award for Contributions to Diversity and Inclusion
      • Jenessa Shapiro Graduate Research Award
      • Diversity Graduate Travel/Registration Award
      • Diversity Undergraduate Registration Award
    • Heritage Wall of Fame
    • International Awards
      • International Travel/Registration Award
      • International Bridge-Building Award
    • Legacy Program
    • Travel/Registration Awards
      • Graduate Travel/Registration Award
      • Diversity Graduate Travel/Registration Award
      • Diversity Undergraduate Registration Award
      • Teacher & Scholar Travel/Registration Award
      • International Travel/Registration Award
      • International Bridge-Building Award
    • Small Research Grant Program
    • Small Conference Grant Program
    • Community Catalyst Grant Program
  • News
    • Character and Context Blog
    • Member Updates
    • Press Releases
    • Member Newsletter
    • Student Newsletter
  • Resources
    • Connect!
    • Racism, Bias & Diversity
    • Free-Form Fridays
    • Students
      • Graduate Program Directory
      • Applying to Grad School
      • Life in Graduate School
    • Early Career
    • Primarily Undergraduate Institutions
    • Multimedia
      • #SPSPchat
      • SPSP Experts
      • Out of the Lab
      • Convention Videos
    • Funding
    • International Study and Work
    • Statistics & Data Analysis
    • Teaching
      • Recommended Textbooks
      • Syllabi Examples
      • Teaching Aids
      • Video
    • Applied Psychology
  • Careers
    • Find/Post a Job
    • Graduation Outcomes
    • Career Resources
    • Academic Job Market
    • Non-Academic Job Market
    • Undergraduate Research

You are here

Home » News » Character and Context Blog

Character  &  Context

The Science of Who We Are and How We Relate
Editors: Judith Hall, Leah Dickens, Colleen Sinclair

 

Jan 21, 2017

The Goodness of Guilt: Problems Measuring the Mind

by Alex Danvers
Feature Image

Researchers are split over guilt. Many of them think that guilt is negative—it feels bad, it’s related to poor functioning, and it’s something we should reduce in our lives. (That may be your assessment, too.) 

But another group of researchers suggests that guilt is good. It leads people to take actions to repair relationships and engage in prosocial behavior. Our attempts to get rid of guilt lead to good behavior—and ultimately the guilt experience and response is positive. 

In her talk “Connecting Affective Traits to their Affective States: A Tale of Two Guilts” at the symposium “Bridging Personality and Social Perspectives: Connections Between Traits and Emotions,” Stefanie Tignor tried to unravel this puzzle by attending to what some might consider the “soft underbelly” of social psychology: measurement. 

The constructs and processes that social psychologists research are complex and myriad, and new theoretical insights or hypotheses often lead people to develop measurement tools specifically suited to their needs. However, when these measurement tools are described in the literature, researchers label them according to the higher order concepts they are meant to tap into. 

For example, in Baumeister, Bratslavsky, Muraven, and Tice’s 1998 paper on ego depletion, the authors measured willpower four different ways in four different studies. One of them involved time spent on an unsolvable problem after having to eat a bowl of radishes—while looking longingly at a nearby bowl of cookies. Another involved number of anagram puzzles solved after watching a funny or sad movie without being allowed to express emotions. Both effects were labeled “ego depletion” because they intuitively seem to tap a similar ability: the willingness to perform a difficult action after having had to inhibit a dominant response. 

However, when a recent large-scale replication of an ego depletion study found a null effect, Baumeister was correct to point out that only one of many ways of measuring ego depletion showed no effect. It could be possible that other versions of the task lead to other conclusions. Really resolving debates in the psychological literature like this involve not just examining the concept that the researcher wanted to measure, but the different ways researchers actually measure them. 

In dealing with the conflicting accounts of guilt, Tignor saw a pattern in what types of measures different researchers were using to assess guilt. Those who said guilt was bad tended to use checklist items. These measures asked people how they tend to feel, devoid of context. 

Those who said guilt was good, on the other hand, tended to use scenario based measures. These emphasized what a participant would do in a given situation, emphasizing responses to feelings. 

In her studies, Tignor asked participants to fill out both kinds of questionnaires, as well as questionnaires about a suite of other adaptive and maladaptive traits. She found that checklist scales of guilt correlated most highly with maladaptive qualities like depression, low self-esteem, or low self-acceptance. Scenario scales, on the other hand, correlated most highly with adaptive qualities like agreeableness, caring about personal growth, and having high empathic concern for others. 

Further, the traits that correlated highly with one measure of guilt didn’t correlate highly with the other. The different ways of measuring guilt were pointing to different personal profiles. 

Finally, Tignor examined how the different ways of measuring guilt predicted day-to-day experiences. The checklist scales were associated with lower day to day ratings of well-being and more negative feelings. The scenario scales, on the other hand, were associated with high well-being and higher frequency of performing prosocial behaviors like being nurturing to a friend or volunteering. 

Overall, these findings suggest that the argument about guilt wasn’t about a single trait—the tendency to feel guilty—at all. Instead, they suggest that researchers have been measuring two different things. One is centered around a generalized emotional response, and this construct—feeling guilty all the time—is related to negative outcomes. Another is centered around specific responses to situations where you’re guilty and this construct—guilting yourself into helping others—is related to positive outcomes. 

The argument in the literature wasn’t about guilt at all. It was about people try to use the same intuitive label—guilt—for two different things. 

While it may be tempting to assume that because two researchers say they are measuring the same thing, we should treat this claim with skepticism. We need psychological research precisely because our lay intuitions about thinking and feeling don’t always map onto what’s really happening in the mind. Instead of arguing about whose perspective is right, it might be better to take a step back and ask what researchers are really measuring.


Alex Danvers is a graduate student in social psychology at Arizona State University. He studies emotions and social interaction from a dynamic systems perspective.

 

Tags: 
neuroscience
emotion

About our Blog

Why is this blog called Character & Context?

Everything that people think, feel, and do is affected by some combination of their personal characteristics and features of the social context they are in at the time. Character & Context explores the latest insights about human behavior from research in personality and social psychology, the scientific field that studies the causes of everyday behaviors.  

□Learn More
□Contribute a Blog to Character & Context

Search the Blog

Get Email Updates from the Blog

Click below to join the Character & Context mailing list.
Subscribe

Popular Articles

Why You Should (Not) Stop Thinking About Work While at Home
Choosing to Be With Other People Matters More to Well-being Than Choosing to Be Alone
The Magical Aura of Insurance
Perceptions of People With Mental Illness as Sexually Exploitable
Finding Your Flow

Share this page
 
Society for Personality and Social Psychology
1120 Connecticut Ave NW, Suite 280
Washington, DC 20036
(202) 869-3240
info@spsp.org
Facebook Icon Twitter Icon LinkedIn Icon
  • Connect!
  • Join/Login
  • Home
  • About
  • Members
  • Publications
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Awards/Grants
  • News
  • Resources
  • Careers
© 2022. Society for Personality and Social Psychology®. All rights reserved.

View our Privacy Policy here.