Skip to main content
Home
  • Connect!
  • Donate
  • My Account
  • Join/Login
  • S
  • Connect!
  • Join/Login
  • Home
  • About
    • What is Social and Personality Psychology?
    • Leadership
      • Elections
    • Get Involved
    • Committees
    • Diversity & Inclusion Initiatives
    • Government Relations
    • Governance Documents
    • Staff
    • Jobs at SPSP
      • Benefits of Working at SPSP
      • Current Openings
  • Members
    • Membership Categories and Rates
    • Member Demographics
    • Member Directory
    • Collaboration Zone
    • APA Division 8
    • Fellows
    • Listservs and Shared Interest Groups
    • Member Deals and Discounts
  • Publications
    • Best Practices
    • Publication Policies
    • Resources
    • PSPB
      • Editorial Philosophy
      • Manuscript Preparation/Submission Guidelines
      • PSPB Online
    • PSPR
      • Editorial Philosophy
      • Manuscript Preparation
      • PSPR Online
    • SPPS
      • Manuscript Preparation
      • SPPS Online
  • Events
    • 2022 Convention
    • Future/Past Conventions
    • Summer Psychology Forum
    • Society of Southeastern Social Psychologists
    • APA Convention (Division 8)
    • Student Opportunities
      • SISPP
      • SPUR
      • EASP
      • EAPP
    • Learning Online
  • Giving
    • Ways to Give
    • Planned Giving
    • Tribute Wall
    • Annual Reports
    • ARP Awards
  • Awards/Grants
    • Annual Awards
      • Senior Career Contribution Awards
      • Mid-Career Awards
      • Early Career Awards
      • Teaching and Mentoring Awards
      • Prizes for a Single Outstanding Contribution
      • Media Awards
      • Service Awards
      • Student Awards
      • Diversity Awards
    • Student Awards
      • Heritage Dissertation Research Award
      • Outstanding Research Award
      • Graduate Student Poster Award
      • Undergraduate Student Poster Award
      • Student Publication Prize
      • Jenessa Shapiro Graduate Research Award
      • Graduate Travel/Registration Award
      • Diversity Graduate Travel/Registration Award
      • Diversity Undergraduate Registration Award
    • Diversity Awards
      • Jenessa Shapiro Award for Contributions to Diversity and Inclusion
      • Jenessa Shapiro Graduate Research Award
      • Diversity Graduate Travel/Registration Award
      • Diversity Undergraduate Registration Award
    • Heritage Wall of Fame
    • International Awards
      • International Travel/Registration Award
      • International Bridge-Building Award
    • Legacy Program
    • Travel/Registration Awards
      • Graduate Travel/Registration Award
      • Diversity Graduate Travel/Registration Award
      • Diversity Undergraduate Registration Award
      • Teacher & Scholar Travel/Registration Award
      • International Travel/Registration Award
      • International Bridge-Building Award
    • Small Research Grant Program
    • Small Conference Grant Program
    • Community Catalyst Grant Program
  • News
    • Character and Context Blog
    • Member Updates
    • Press Releases
    • Member Newsletter
    • Student Newsletter
  • Resources
    • Connect!
    • Racism, Bias & Diversity
    • Free-Form Fridays
    • Students
      • Graduate Program Directory
      • Applying to Grad School
      • Life in Graduate School
    • Early Career
    • Primarily Undergraduate Institutions
    • Multimedia
      • #SPSPchat
      • SPSP Experts
      • Out of the Lab
      • Convention Videos
    • Funding
    • International Study and Work
    • Statistics & Data Analysis
    • Teaching
      • Recommended Textbooks
      • Syllabi Examples
      • Teaching Aids
      • Video
    • Applied Psychology
  • Careers
    • Find/Post a Job
    • Graduation Outcomes
    • Career Resources
    • Academic Job Market
    • Non-Academic Job Market
    • Undergraduate Research
  • Connect!
  • Join/Login
  • Home
  • About
    • What is Social and Personality Psychology?
    • Leadership
      • Elections
    • Get Involved
    • Committees
    • Diversity & Inclusion Initiatives
    • Government Relations
    • Governance Documents
    • Staff
    • Jobs at SPSP
      • Benefits of Working at SPSP
      • Current Openings
  • Members
    • Membership Categories and Rates
    • Member Demographics
    • Member Directory
    • Collaboration Zone
    • APA Division 8
    • Fellows
    • Listservs and Shared Interest Groups
    • Member Deals and Discounts
  • Publications
    • Best Practices
    • Publication Policies
    • Resources
    • PSPB
      • Editorial Philosophy
      • Manuscript Preparation/Submission Guidelines
      • PSPB Online
    • PSPR
      • Editorial Philosophy
      • Manuscript Preparation
      • PSPR Online
    • SPPS
      • Manuscript Preparation
      • SPPS Online
  • Events
    • 2022 Convention
    • Future/Past Conventions
    • Summer Psychology Forum
    • Society of Southeastern Social Psychologists
    • APA Convention (Division 8)
    • Student Opportunities
      • SISPP
      • SPUR
      • EASP
      • EAPP
    • Learning Online
  • Giving
    • Ways to Give
    • Planned Giving
    • Tribute Wall
    • Annual Reports
    • ARP Awards
  • Awards/Grants
    • Annual Awards
      • Senior Career Contribution Awards
      • Mid-Career Awards
      • Early Career Awards
      • Teaching and Mentoring Awards
      • Prizes for a Single Outstanding Contribution
      • Media Awards
      • Service Awards
      • Student Awards
      • Diversity Awards
    • Student Awards
      • Heritage Dissertation Research Award
      • Outstanding Research Award
      • Graduate Student Poster Award
      • Undergraduate Student Poster Award
      • Student Publication Prize
      • Jenessa Shapiro Graduate Research Award
      • Graduate Travel/Registration Award
      • Diversity Graduate Travel/Registration Award
      • Diversity Undergraduate Registration Award
    • Diversity Awards
      • Jenessa Shapiro Award for Contributions to Diversity and Inclusion
      • Jenessa Shapiro Graduate Research Award
      • Diversity Graduate Travel/Registration Award
      • Diversity Undergraduate Registration Award
    • Heritage Wall of Fame
    • International Awards
      • International Travel/Registration Award
      • International Bridge-Building Award
    • Legacy Program
    • Travel/Registration Awards
      • Graduate Travel/Registration Award
      • Diversity Graduate Travel/Registration Award
      • Diversity Undergraduate Registration Award
      • Teacher & Scholar Travel/Registration Award
      • International Travel/Registration Award
      • International Bridge-Building Award
    • Small Research Grant Program
    • Small Conference Grant Program
    • Community Catalyst Grant Program
  • News
    • Character and Context Blog
    • Member Updates
    • Press Releases
    • Member Newsletter
    • Student Newsletter
  • Resources
    • Connect!
    • Racism, Bias & Diversity
    • Free-Form Fridays
    • Students
      • Graduate Program Directory
      • Applying to Grad School
      • Life in Graduate School
    • Early Career
    • Primarily Undergraduate Institutions
    • Multimedia
      • #SPSPchat
      • SPSP Experts
      • Out of the Lab
      • Convention Videos
    • Funding
    • International Study and Work
    • Statistics & Data Analysis
    • Teaching
      • Recommended Textbooks
      • Syllabi Examples
      • Teaching Aids
      • Video
    • Applied Psychology
  • Careers
    • Find/Post a Job
    • Graduation Outcomes
    • Career Resources
    • Academic Job Market
    • Non-Academic Job Market
    • Undergraduate Research

You are here

Home » News » Character and Context Blog

Character  &  Context

The Science of Who We Are and How We Relate
Editors: Judith Hall, Leah Dickens, Colleen Sinclair

 

Oct 27, 2021

Are We Speaking the Same Language When It Comes to Diversity?

by Kathryn A. Howard
Colorful painted group of people figures

You do not have to be a political scientist to sense the increasing animosity and viewpoint divide between liberals and conservatives in the United States. Anyone who has a Facebook or Twitter page, or has discussed politics with family around the dinner table, has either witnessed, or participated in, a heated political disagreement. Research has confirmed that these political disagreements may be increasing in number and intensity.

Diversity Is Increasingly Central In Debates

Diversity has become increasingly central to the public and political eye. Steadily increasing racial, ethnic, gender, and cultural diversity in the United States, coupled with movements such as Black Lives Matter (BLM), have emphasized the need to create new social policies to accommodate the evolving nature and demands of society.

However, much like other social issues, political disagreement stands in the way of quick reform.  A comparative viewing of Fox News and CNN quickly reveals that liberals and conservatives do not agree on the best way to navigate diversity-related issues. One reason for this disagreement could be simply attitudinal: liberals inherently like diversity, and conservatives do not. 

But, an alternative reason may have to do with the actual meaning of the word itself. Diversity may take on different meanings for different people. Liberals and conservatives may possess different prototypical understandings of the word diversity. If liberals and conservatives don’t agree upon the meaning of the term, how can we expect them to cooperate on future diversity-related policy?

Prototypes of Diversity

A prototype represents the most ideal, or stereotypical, object for a category. It is what comes to mind first. For example, a robin, rather than an ostrich, would likely be the most prototypical bird for a person living in the U.S. A person’s knowledge, culture, and life experiences determine how prototypes are formed. Thus, it is possible liberals and conservatives possess different prototypical understandings of diversity, and these different understandings shape attitudes and behavior.

My colleagues and I investigated this possibility. Participants were presented with a list of community features that may be relevant to diversity, such as race, gender, age, political ideology, attitudes towards global warming, music preferences, etc. Participants then rated how much diversity they would want in their ideal community for each feature. For example, when presented with the feature “ethnicity,” participants rated the extent they wanted no diversity in ethnicity (everyone the same), to complete diversity in ethnicity (everyone is different from each other).

Next, we assessed participants’ prototypical understandings of diversity. For this, participants were asked to rate the extent each community feature came to mind when they imagined a diverse community. For example, when presented with the feature “many different ethnicities,” participants rated on a scale whether ethnicity was “not at all” relevant to their thinking, or “highly relevant” to their thinking.

Indeed, we found that diversity is not understood as a single concept. People actually held at least three different notions of diversity:

  • Demographic (such as race, age, gender, language),
  • Viewpoint (such as political ideology, attitudes toward global warming, attitudes toward gay marriage), and
  • Consumer diversity (as in stores, restaurants, music).

Ideological differences also emerged: conservatives reported more tolerance towards viewpoint diversity than liberals, and liberals were more tolerant towards demographic diversity than conservatives. Thus, conservatives may be more open to living in a community where people have many different ideological attitudes, and liberals may be more open to living in a community with many different racial and ethnic identities. These findings are somewhat surprising because previous research often concludes that liberals are more open to diversity across the board.

These differences connect to differences in understandings of what diversity is. Although both liberals and conservatives considered demographic features as part of their prototypical understanding of diversity, conservatives also perceived viewpoint features and consumer features as part of diversity. On the contrary, liberals only perceived demographic features as part of diversity. In other words, when liberals think about diversity, they are primarily thinking about people from diverse race, age, and gender backgrounds. Conservatives, on the other hand, tend to also think about different political viewpoints, and different types of music, stores, and restaurants, when they think about diversity. Thus, conservatives may have a looser definition of diversity compared to liberals.

Thus, liberals and conservatives are not quite speaking the same language when they talk about diversity. One reason is that conservatives and liberals tend to expose themselves to different news and social media worlds. Sole exposure to such sources may teach people different definitions of diversity. Personal experience may also enter in. For example, living in a highly homogeneous environment may make someone’s understanding of diversity more general compared to a person who lives in a highly populated, highly diverse, area. If a person lives in a community where people are demographically the same but vary in political viewpoints, then that person may be more likely to perceive viewpoint features as relevant to diversity, as that is the only type of diversity they are exposed to.

In this research we learned that diversity itself has multiple components. By breaking the concept of diversity into smaller parts, we may be able to identify the parts on which liberals and conservatives do agree. This agreement could be one small step in the direction of reducing political polarization, and encouraging future cooperation on diversity policy.


For Further Reading

Howard, K. A., Cervone, D., & Motyl, M. (2021). On the varieties of diversity: Ideological variations in attitudes toward, and understandings of, diversity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. doi: 10.1177/01461672211028141.

Danbold, F., & Unzueta, M. M. (2020). Drawing the diversity line: Numerical thresholds of diversity vary by group status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 118(2), 283-306. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000182.

Mason, L. (2015). “I disrespectfully agree”: The differential effects of partisan sorting on social and issue polarization. American Journal of Political Science, 59(1), 128-145. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12089.
 

Kathryn A. Howard is a PhD candidate at the University of Illinois at Chicago where she studies ideological conflict, voting behavior after political candidates transgress, and perceptions of diversity.

 

Tags: 
diversity
ideology
prototypes
politics
liberals
conservatism

About our Blog

Why is this blog called Character & Context?

Everything that people think, feel, and do is affected by some combination of their personal characteristics and features of the social context they are in at the time. Character & Context explores the latest insights about human behavior from research in personality and social psychology, the scientific field that studies the causes of everyday behaviors.  

□Learn More
□Contribute a Blog to Character & Context

Search the Blog

Get Email Updates from the Blog

Click below to join the Character & Context mailing list.
Subscribe

Popular Articles

Can Feeling Good About Recycling Make Us More Wasteful?
Does Reliance on Merit Principles Lead to Discrimination?
Why Is a Polo Shirt Like a Peacock’s Tail?
Why You Should (Not) Stop Thinking About Work While at Home
Choosing to Be With Other People Matters More to Well-being Than Choosing to Be Alone

Share this page
 
Society for Personality and Social Psychology
1120 Connecticut Ave NW, Suite 280
Washington, DC 20036
(202) 869-3240
info@spsp.org
Facebook Icon Twitter Icon LinkedIn Icon
  • Connect!
  • Join/Login
  • Home
  • About
  • Members
  • Publications
  • Events
  • Giving
  • Awards/Grants
  • News
  • Resources
  • Careers
© 2022. Society for Personality and Social Psychology®. All rights reserved.

View our Privacy Policy here.